Difference between revisions of "The Rolling Release Development Model"

m
Increased readability
(Marked this version for translation)
m (Increased readability)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
<translate>
<translate>
<!--T:4-->
<!--T:4-->
* You never need to system upgrades.  Just continue to run updates as normal and you will always be on the latest version
* You never need a major system '''upgrade'''.  Just continue to run small '''updates''' as normal and you will always be on the latest version.
* The latest version of all software packages is always available, there is no need to resort to snaps or flatpaks to run current software
* The latest version of all software packages is always available, there is no need to resort to snaps or flatpaks to run current software
</translate>
</translate>
Line 19: Line 19:
<translate>
<translate>
<!--T:6-->
<!--T:6-->
* The system *must* roll forward as unit so it difficult to hold any individual package at an older version without breaking your system
* The system ''must'' roll forward as a unit so it's difficult to hold any individual package at an older version without breaking your system eventually
* Since everything is being updated when updates are available it is a challenge to run a rolling release distro in an environment where bandwidth is extremely limited
* Since everything is being updated when updates are available it is a challenge to run a rolling release distro in an environment where bandwidth is extremely limited
* You must update your system before installing software.  Not doing so can leave your system in an inconsistent, partially upgraded state
* You must update your system before installing software.  Not doing so can leave your system in an inconsistent, partially upgraded state
Moderators, translator
286

edits