Difference between revisions of "Some basics of MBR v/s GPT and BIOS v/s UEFI"

Some basics of MBR v/s GPT and BIOS v/s UEFI (view source)

6 bytes removed , 10 years ago

m

Anonymous user

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 Technical changes abound in UEFI. UEFI has room for more useful and usable features than could ever be crammed into the BIOS. Among these are cryptography, network authentication, support for extensions stored on non-volatile media, an integrated boot manager, and even a shell environment for running other EFI applications such as diagnostic utilities or flash updates. In addition, both the architecture and the drivers are CPU-independent, which opens the door to a wider variety of processors (including those using the ARM architecture, for example).
-However, UEFI is still not widespread. Though major hardware companies have switched over almost exclusively to UEFI use, you still won't find the new firmware in use on all motherboards—or in quite the same way across the spectrum. Many older and less expensive motherboards also still use the BIOS system.
+However, UEFI is still not widespread. Though major hardware companies have switched over almost exclusively to UEFI use, you still won't find the new firmware in use on all motherboards—or in quite the same way across the spectrum. Many older and less expensive motherboards also still use the BIOS system. [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392944,00.asp]
-From: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392944,00.asp
 == MBR vs. GPT and BIOS vs. UEFI ==