Difference between revisions of "Translations:Firewalls/15/en"

Latest revision as of 09:12, 25 December 2021

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Firewalls)

You may notice a difference in the above two commands. When we built the rules for ssh we used the name and for https we used the port number, 8443. This is because UFW has a small database of applications it knows the ports for. You can see the list with the command:
$usercmd5

You may notice a difference in the above two commands.  When we built the rules for ssh we used the name and for https we used the port number, 8443.  This is because UFW has a small database of applications it knows the ports for.  You can see the list with the command:
$usercmd5

You may notice a difference in the above two commands. When we built the rules for ssh we used the name and for https we used the port number, 8443. This is because UFW has a small database of applications it knows the ports for. You can see the list with the command: $usercmd5

Revision as of 16:43, 7 September 2021 (view source) FuzzyBot (talk \| contribs) (Importing a new version from external source)		Latest revision as of 09:12, 25 December 2021 (view source) FuzzyBot (talk \| contribs) (Importing a new version from external source)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	You may notice a difference in the above two commands. When we built the rules for ssh we used the name and for https we used the port number, 8443. This is because UFW has a small database of applications it knows the ports for. You can see the list with the command:		You may notice a difference in the above two commands. When we built the rules for ssh we used the name and for https we used the port number, 8443. This is because UFW has a small database of applications it knows the ports for. You can see the list with the command:
	~~sudo ufw app list~~		$usercmd5